Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in tremulous parkinsonian patients: a blinded video study
Résumé
This study examines the clinical accuracy of movement disorder specialists in distinguishing tremor dominant Parkinson¡¯s disease (TDPD) from other tremulous movement disorders by the use of standardised patient videos. Two movement disorder specialists were asked to distinguish TDPD from patients with atypical tremor and dystonic tremor, who had no evidence of presynaptic dopaminergic deficit (subjects without evidence of dopaminergic deficit or SWEDDs) according to 123I-N-¥ø-fluoro-propyl- 2©¬-carbomethoxy-3©¬-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane ([123I] FP-CIT) SPECT, by ¡®blinded¡¯ video analysis in 38 patients. A diagnosis of Parkinsonism was made if the step 1 criteria of the Queen Square Brain Bank criteria for Parkinson¡¯s disease were fulfilled. The reviewer diagnosis was compared to the working clinical diagnosis drawn from the medical history, SPECT scan result, long term follow-up and in some cases the known response to dopaminergic medications. This comparison allowed a calculation for false positive and false negative rate of diagnosis of PD. We found a high false positive (17.4 to 26.1%) and negative rate (6.7 to 20%) for the diagnosis of PD. The diagnostic distinction of TDPD from dystonic tremor was reduced by the presence of dystonic features in treated and untreated PD patients. Clinical distinction of TDPD from atypical tremor, monosymptomatic rest tremor, and dystonic tremor can be difficult, due to the presence of parkinsonian features in tremulous SWEDD patients. The diagnosis of bradykinesia was particularly challenging. This study highlights the difficulty of differentiation of some cases of SWEDD from PD.
| Origine | Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s) |
|---|---|
| Licence |