[Clinical audit on the use of expensive systemic antifungals in the Besançon University Hospital]
Abstract
The continuous improvement policy for healthcare quality requires practice evaluation. The principle of a clinical audit is to compare practice to guidelines. Prescription guidelines on antifungal agent use has been available in our hospital since 2003. It was updated in 2005 and 2006. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess compliance to guidelines, with an audit of prescriptions: amphotericin B lipid formulation, voriconazole and caspofungin, expensive antifungals concerned by the budget allowance correlated to activity, subject to supplementary reimbursement to the coded Homogeneous Group of Diseases. METHOD: The assessment criteria were: relevance of the indication, absence of a better alternative, complying to recommended dosage, loading dose and timing. This retrospective study dealt with all prescriptions of all departments, from January to May 2007. RESULTS: Hundred and eighteen prescriptions were retrospectively analyzed for 81 patients. The rate of overall conformity was 54%. Antifungal therapy was justified for 113 prescriptions (96%). In 30% of the cases, a more efficient alternative was advised, cheaper or less toxic. The dosage and the charge dosing were right in 92% and 80% of the cases respectively. CONCLUSION: This audit allowed assessing good-use of antifungals. We showed an over-prescription of caspofungin and sometimes insufficient regimen of voriconazole dosages for children. Reporting these audit results and development of new international guidelines stress the need to update local recommendations regularly.