Double reading of outsourced CT/MR radiology reports - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Patient Safety Year : 2019

Double reading of outsourced CT/MR radiology reports

(1) , (2, 3) , (4, 5) , (6, 7) , (8, 9) , (10) , (11) , (3) , (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine disagreement rates in radiological reports provided by using a double-reading protocol in a national teleradiology company. METHODS: From January 2015 to July 2016, 134169 radiological exams from 36 French centers, benefited outsourced interpretations by certified radiologists, in both regular and after-hours activities. Of these, 2040 CT and MR-scans (1.5%) were subjected to a second opinion by other radiologists in the field of their anatomical specialty (cerebral, thoracic, abdominal-pelvic, and osteoarticular). A five-point agreement scale graded from 0 to 4 was assigned for each exam. Disagreements were considered as minor if no clinical consequence for patient (scores 1 and 2) and major if potential clinical consequence (score 3 and 4). Independent radiologists performed a retrospective analysis and a stratified statistical analysis. RESULTS: Double reading was performed on CT-scans (n = 934/2040, 45.8%) and MR-scans (n = 1106/2040, 54.2%) performed in regular (80.1%) and after-hours activities (19.9%). Disagreement scores occurred in 437 exams (21.4%), including major disagreements in 59 (2.9%). Among these, 48/754 were assigned by the thoracic second reader (6.4%), 6/70 by the abdominal-pelvic second reader (8.6%), 3/901 by the osteoarticular second reader (0.3%), and 2/315 by the cerebral second reader (0.6%), with statistical significant difference. No additional disagreement rate was observed in regular and after-hours activities (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Double-reading of outsourced CT and MRI interpretations yielded 21.4% disagreement rate, with potential clinical consequence for patient in 2,9% of the cases. These results are in accordance with those previously reported and suggests that quality assurance of outsourced interpretations is needed.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
vendrell_23084.pdf (719.88 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-02063156 , version 1 (21-05-2019)

Identifiers

Cite

Jean-François Vendrell, Julien Frandon, Bastien Boussat, François Cotton, Gilbert R. Ferretti, et al.. Double reading of outsourced CT/MR radiology reports. Journal of Patient Safety, inPress, ⟨10.1097/PTS.0000000000000525⟩. ⟨hal-02063156⟩
1415 View
79 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More