VERGIL AND DIDO - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Dialectica Year : 2003


Jérôme Pelletier


According to many realist philosophers of fiction, one needs to posit an ontology of existing fictional characters in order to give a correct account of discourse about fiction. The realists' claim is opposed by pretense theorists for whom discourse about fiction involves, as discourse in fiction, pretense. On that basis, pretense theorists claim that one does not need to embrace an ontology of fictional characters to give an account of discourse about fiction. The ontolog-ical dispute between realists and pretense theorists is mainly a dispute in the realm of the phi-losophy of language concerning the status relative to pretense of discourse about fiction. Realists are persuaded that there is a sharp line between discourse in fiction and discourse about fiction while pretense theorists deny there exists such a line. I suggest that realists may have a wrong picture of discourse in fiction since, in many cases, discourse in fiction already contains many occurrences of discourse about fiction. Consequently, discourse about fiction, instead of ending fiction, should be regarded, following pretense theorists, as adding extra lay-ers of fiction.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
ijn_00000478_00.pdf (56.16 Ko) Télécharger le fichier

Dates and versions

ijn_00000478 , version 1 (08-04-2004)


  • HAL Id : ijn_00000478 , version 1


Jérôme Pelletier. VERGIL AND DIDO. Dialectica, 2003, 57 (2), pp.191-203. ⟨ijn_00000478⟩
76 View
113 Download


Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More