Assessment of Common and Emerging Bioinformatics Pipelines for Targeted Metagenomics - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue PLoS ONE Année : 2017

Assessment of Common and Emerging Bioinformatics Pipelines for Targeted Metagenomics

(1, 2) , (1, 2) , (3, 4) , (3, 4) , (4) , (3, 4)
1
2
3
4

Résumé

Targeted metagenomics, also known as metagenetics, is a high-throughput sequencing application focusing on a nucleotide target in a microbiome to describe its taxonomic content. A wide range of bioinformatics pipelines are available to analyze sequencing outputs, and the choice of an appropriate tool is crucial and not trivial. No standard evaluation method exists for estimating the accuracy of a pipeline for targeted metagenomics analyses. This article proposes an evaluation protocol containing real and simulated targeted metage-nomics datasets, and adequate metrics allowing us to study the impact of different variables on the biological interpretation of results. This protocol was used to compare six different bioinformatics pipelines in the basic user context: Three common ones (mothur, QIIME and BMP) based on a clustering-first approach and three emerging ones (Kraken, CLARK and One Codex) using an assignment-first approach. This study surprisingly reveals that the effect of sequencing errors has a bigger impact on the results that choosing different amplified regions. Moreover, increasing sequencing throughput increases richness overestima-tion, even more so for microbiota of high complexity. Finally, the choice of the reference database has a bigger impact on richness estimation for clustering-first pipelines, and on correct taxa identification for assignment-first pipelines. Using emerging assignment-first pipelines is a valid approach for targeted metagenomics analyses, with a quality of results comparable to popular clustering-first pipelines, even with an error-prone sequencing technology like Ion Torrent. However, those pipelines are highly sensitive to the quality of databases and their annotations, which makes clustering-first pipelines still the only reliable approach for studying microbiomes that are not well described.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
journal.pone.0169563.pdf (3.13 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01575755 , version 1 (21-08-2017)

Identifiants

Citer

Léa Siegwald, Hélène Touzet, Yves Lemoine, David Hot, Christophe Audebert, et al.. Assessment of Common and Emerging Bioinformatics Pipelines for Targeted Metagenomics. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12 (1), pp.e0169563. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0169563⟩. ⟨hal-01575755⟩
178 Consultations
196 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More